Subject: Hillary to Replace Biden
Can not verify this but it would not surprise me. (I received this from my aunt who was a bank president for many years and worked at the same bank for over 40 years)
Let me share some info with you that I have gotten from excellent sources within the DNC: On or about October 5th, Biden will excuse himself from the ticket, citing health problems, and he will be replaced by Hillary. This is timed to occur after the VP debate on 10/2. There have been talks all weekend about how to proceed with this info. generally, the feeling is that we should all go ahead and get it out there to as many blog sites and personal email lists as is possible. I have already seen a few short blurbs about this - the "health problem" cited in those articles was aneurysm. Probably many of you have heard the same rumblings. However, at this point, with this inside info from the DNC, it looks like this Obama strategy will be a go. Therefore, it seems that the best strategy is to get out in front of this Obama maneuver, spell it out in detail, and thereby expose it for the grand manipulation that it is.
So, let's start mixing this one up and cut the Obamaites off at the pass - send this info out to as many people as you can - post about it on websites and blogs - etc etc
If this is exposed before it comes about - we can beat Obama at his own game.
Subject: Hillary to Replace Biden
Can not verify this but it would not surprise me. (I received this from my aunt who was a bank president for many years and worked at the same bank for over 40 years) What is the point here? I really wish I could hit the "reply all" button and see if the orignal idiot could tell me.
Let me share some info with you that I have gotten from excellent sources within the DNC: On or about October 5th, Biden will excuse himself from the ticket, citing health problems, and he will be replaced by Hillary. This is timed to occur after the VP debate on 10/2. Why would you time it then. It does not make sense. It would give Hillary more credit to be in the debate to pull the Palin supporters to the Democrat's ticket. Again, idiot thing to say.
There have been talks all weekend about how to proceed with this info. generally, the feeling is that we should all go ahead and get it out there to as many blog sites and personal email lists as is possible. Sure, you succeeded. Its on my blog, but only to critizize your stupidity. Now you've introduced "we." Who is we? Your aunt who is extremely knowledgable in politics thanks to 40 years at a bank? Maybe if you got better information from your source you could release "your information" to actual news sites.
I have already seen a few short blurbs about this - the "health problem" cited in those articles was aneurysm. Probably many of you have heard the same rumblings. However, at this point, with this inside info from the DNC, it looks like this Obama strategy will be a go. Therefore, it seems that the best strategy is to get out in front of this Obama maneuver, spell it out in detail, and thereby expose it for the grand manipulation that it is. "with this inside info from the DNC, it looks like this Obama strategy will be a go.", So, now you are telling me that you had inside information that this was going to happen before "your source" in the DNC told you? You told us above that you found out about this from "your source" why wouldn't you mention that you've heard this elsewhere in the begining? It would give your statement more credibility.
So, let's start mixing this one up and cut the Obamaites off at the pass - send this info out to as many people as you can - post about it on websites and blogs - etc etc
If this is exposed before it comes about - we can beat Obama at his own game.
I hate stupid people.
